[
Home
] [Others]
Here are our comments on a few issues that don’t fit any of the other categories.
A 1997 book "The Grand Chessboard" said that a New Pearl Harbor would help gain support for US actions to gain control of Central Asia
Neo-con think tank predicted a New Pearl Harbour
Pakistan’s ISI helped fund the 9/11 attacks, and America covered it up, perhaps to avoid an investigation of the cosy relationship between the ISI and CIA
There were suspiciously few passengers on each of the hijacked planes
If the attacks were supposed to kill the maximum number of people, then why not fly a plane into a nuclear power plant?
Many supposedly dead passengers are not listed as killed in the Social Security Death Index
The cellphone calls supposedly made from hijacked planes on 9/11 were faked
Air Force One was threatened on 9/11 using the top secret code word Angel, indicating insider involvement in the attacks
The virtually indestructible black boxes all mysteriously disappeared
A Bush-linked bank is given a record fine for laundering terrorist funds
Bush and bin Ladin have financial interests in the Carlyle Group, which has made billions of profits from the Iraq war
FAA records indicate two of the supposedly hijacked flights were not destroyed on 9/11
The senior researcher on Popular Mechanics 9/11 Debunking piece is the cousin of Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff
A 9/11 Government conspiracy wouldn’t require as many people as some seem to believe
A surprisingly large number of world-renowned microbiologists were mysteriously killed in the weeks after 9/11
It’s impossible that the 7/7 London bombings could have so precisely corresponded with an antiterrorist exercise that was running at the same time
[
Home
] [
Hijackers
] [
Foreknowledge
] [
Stand down
] [
WTC (demolition)
] [
WTC (other)
] [
WTC7 and Silverstein
] [
Pentagon
] [
Flight 93
] [
bin Ladin
] [
Obstructing Justice
] [
Afghanistan
] [Others] [
Investigations, more
] [
What's New?
]