This site has been online for almost 18 months now, and in that time has attracted considerable negative attention. Some people really don't want to admit we might have a point, even occasionally, and prefer to attack what we're saying instead. So it's really no surprise that someone would produce what they called a "debunking" of the site, nor is it a particular concern: we've no wish to spread false information, and if there are errors on the site then we're happy to correct them. So what has this "debunking" turned up? Let's take a look.


Debunking 9/11 Myths DRAFT (http://911myths.com)

By Chris Morganti (911Physics.co.nr) & LetsRoll911.Org Forum Members

Introduction:

911Myths.com is a website that is similar to the debunking piece published by Popular Mechanics. 911Myths is a rather convincing debunking piece, I must congratulate Mike Williams on the job he has done. His website is very long therefore it seems I will have to make multiple sections to go through what he claims to be correct. I have not bothered to cover everything he has "debunked" due to the fact some of his arguments are where he just attacks a straw man rather than a real issue. After finishing this article I may or may not choose to update it in the future, since it is likely Mike will alter his articles in response to this article.


Here Chris seems to be polite, which is more than we expected: a welcome surprise. However we already have an admission that he's left out chunks of the website because, supposedly, some of them are "straw man" arguments. There's no way of evaluating that if you leave them out, though, is there, Chris? Let's see if the issues he addresses are any more substantial.